| Qualifications assessment |
Valutazione titoliPunteggio massimo complessivo per la prova/overall max score: 80Valutazione voto di laurea magistrale
Master degree evaluationPunteggio massimo/max score: 12
I candidati in possesso del titolo di laurea magistrale o equivalente, saranno valutati sulla base della prima griglia, con riferimento a votazioni finali espresse in centodecimi.
I candidati che non hanno ancora svolto l'esame finale di laurea, saranno valutati sulla base della media delle valutazioni degli esami, come da seconda grigila, con riferimento a votazioni espresse in trentesimi.
I candidati che si sono laureati successivamente alla candidatura e in data precedente al colloquio, sono pregati di mostrare alla commissione un certificato del proprio voto di laurea.
Students who already obtained their title, will be evaluated according to the first grid, and based to a final grade expressed in one hundred and tenths (Italian grade scale).
Students who have not obtained their title by the date of the interview, but will obtain the degree before October 31st, will be evaluated according to the second grid, on the base of the average grade resulting from the list of the exams, expressed in thirtieths (Italian grade scale).
Students who obtained their title after the application deadline and before the interview, are requested to show to the examination board an official document including the final degree mark.
110, 110 e lode
Equal to Italian grade 110, 110 cum laude | 12,0 | 108-109
Equal to Italian grade 108-109 | 9,0 | 106-107
Equal to Italian grade 106-107 | 7,0 | 103-105
Equal to Italian grade 103-105 | 5,0 | 100-102
Equal to Italian grade 100-102 | 2,0 | <100
Equal to Italian grade <100 | 0,0 |
29 - 30
Equal to Italian average grade 29 - 30 | 12,0 | 28 – 28,99
Equal to Italian average grade 28 - 28.99 | 9,0 | 27,5 - 27,99
Equal to Italian average grade 27.5 - 27.99 | 7,0 | 27- 27,49
Equal to Italian average grade 27-27.49 | 5,0 | 26 - 26.99
Equal to Italian average grade 26 - 26.99 | 2,0 | <26
Less than Italian average grade 26 | 0,0 |
Voto di laurea triennale
Bachelor degree evaluationPunteggio massimo/max score: 10
110, 110 e lode
Equal to Italian grades 110 and 110 cum laude | 10,0 | 105-109
Equal to Italian grade 105-109 | 8,0 | 100-105
Equal to Italian grade 100-105 | 6,0 | 95-99
Equal to Italian grade 95-99 | 4,0 | 90-94
Equal to Italian grade 90-94 | 2,0 | <90
Equal to Italian grade <90 | 0,0 |
Esperienze di ricerca e pubblicazioni
Research experiences and publicationsPunteggio massimo/max score: 6
The examination board will evaluate the candidate based upon the following information:
1) publications authored or co-authored by the candidate;
2) research activities conducted in qualified universities or research institutes;
3) research grants, contracts, fellowships obtained by the candidate;
4) participation in research networks or groups;
5) presentations in national or international research conferences;
6) prizes and awards obtained by the candidate for his/her research.
The examination board will evaluate the candidate based upon the following information:
1) publications authored or co-authored by the candidate;
2) research activities conducted in qualified universities or research institutes;
3) research grants, contracts, fellowships obtained by the candidate;
4) participation in research networks or groups;
5) presentations in national or international research conferences;
6) prizes and awards obtained by the candidate for his/her research.
Attività di formazione avanzata o postlaurea
Advanced or postgraduate training activitiesPunteggio massimo/max score: 6
The examination board will evaluate the candidate’s participation to any training activity, course or teaching program that is sufficiently advanced and coherent with the PhD.
The evaluation will be based on the content of the activity, the qualification of the providing institute, the final mark (if available), the degree of coherence with the PhD and with the research project presented by the candidate.
The examination board will evaluate the candidate’s participation to any training activity, course or teaching program that is sufficiently advanced and coherent with the PhD.
The evaluation will be based on the content of the activity, the qualification of the providing institute, the final mark (if available), the degree of coherence with the PhD and with the research project presented by the candidate.
Altre esperienze rilevanti
Other relevant experiencesPunteggio massimo/max score: 6
The examination board will evaluate the following: 1) Studying or internship periods conducted abroad, including those conducted within the Erasmus or similar programs.
2) Teaching experiences.
3) Working experiences that are coherent and useful for the purposes of the PhD program.
4) Participation in activities that are coherent with the so-called university’s ‘third mission’, i.e. aimed at the transfer or use of advanced knowledge to help resolve societal challenges or promote innovation, in cooperation with public or private entities and the civil society.
The examination board will evaluate the following: 1) Studying or internship periods conducted abroad, including those conducted within the Erasmus or similar programs.
2) Teaching experiences.
3) Working experiences that are coherent and useful for the purposes of the PhD program.
4) Participation in activities that are coherent with the so-called university’s ‘third mission’, i.e. aimed at the transfer or use of advanced knowledge to help resolve societal challenges or promote innovation, in cooperation with public or private entities and the civil society.
Progetto di ricerca
Research projectPunteggio massimo/max score: 40
Relevance and originality of the project (max)
Relevance and originality of the project (max) | 8,0 | Knowledge of the state-of-the-art of research on the topic (max)
Knowledge of the state-of-the-art of research on the topic (max) | 8,0 | Quality of the research strategy, and its potential to advance the state-of-the-art (max)
Quality of the research strategy, and its potential to advance the state-of-the-art (max) | 8,0 | Quality and appropriateness of the methodology, and feasibility of the research (max)
Quality and appropriateness of the methodology, and feasibility of the research (max) | 8,0 | Relevance to the educational and scientific objectives of the PhD program (max)
Relevance to the educational and scientific objectives of the PhD program (max) | 8,0 |
|