MICHELANGELO BRUNO

PhD Graduate

PhD program:: XXXIV



Thesis title: The impact of share buybacks and ESG principles on banks

In recent years, the theoretical debate surrounding responsible corporate behavior has expanded beyond financial performance to encompass environmental sustainability, social responsibility, and robust governance practices. This holistic framework, commonly referred to as Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG), has gained significant importance among investors, regulators, and stakeholders as a means to evaluate a company's long-term sustainability and social impact. While ESG considerations have predominantly focused on industries such as energy, manufacturing, and technology, the banking sector, as a crucial pillar of the global economy considering that it allocates financial resources to the economy, is increasingly under scrutiny for its role in promoting sustainable and ethical practices. One additional specific aspect of banking operations that has attracted considerable attention over the last years is the practice of share buybacks. Share buybacks involve a company repurchasing its own outstanding shares from the open market, thereby reducing the number of shares available for trading. This mechanism has gained popularity among banks as a tool to return surplus capital to shareholders, enhance earnings per share, and potentially improve stock prices. This study focuses on both share buybacks in banks as well as the introduction of the ESG considerations into the banking regulatory framework. The paper on share repurchases seeks to provide a comprehensive analysis of how these repurchase programs could potentially negatively impact the long-term value creation in banks. To this extent, share buybacks are intertwined with the ESG principles, as they could potentially undermine the resilience of banks by leading to a potential depletion of their capital position in the long term. The incorporation of the ESG principles into the banking processes as a tool to improve the transparency of the decision-making process could help avoid the adoption of decisions that could be detrimental for the resilience of the bank in the long term. By focusing on share buybacks and ESG principles the study aims at further unveiling potential links between these two relevant aspects widely debated in the financial literature. Throughout this work, we will explore several key questions: How do share buybacks impact a bank's long term value creation? To this extent, what are the implications of share buybacks on the wider audience of stakeholders? Furthermore, what role do share buybacks play in shaping a bank's governance structure, transparency, and risk management practices? To answer these questions, we will draw on a comprehensive review of existing literature as well as empirical evidence of share buybacks in the banking sector. By analyzing the potential trade-offs and synergies between short-term financial gains and long-term sustainable practices, we aim to contribute to the ongoing dialogue surrounding responsible banking. We will then focus the attention on the current banking regulatory framework on ESG principles. The authors believe that the incorporation of such principles into the banking processes could be an effective tool to improve the decision-making process in banks. The last part of the work will focus on the climate risk stress test as a successful tool to test the resilience of banks to environmental-related risks. The aim of this study is to further enhance the existing knowledge on share buybacks of banks and the introduction of the ESG principles on the banking regulatory framework as the common thread of both aspects is the long-term resilience of the banks. This research endeavors to provide insights that can inform regulatory frameworks, guide investor strategies, and empower banking institutions to adopt a more transparent decision-making process as well as more sustainable and socially responsible practices. By recognizing the multifaceted nature of banking operations, we can pave the way for a more resilient and inclusive financial sector that aligns its activities with the broader goals of environmental stewardship, social progress, and robust governance. In the following pages we will briefly introduce the three research topics covered in this study. Introduction of the ESG principles in the European banking regulatory framework The growing recognition of the need to address environmental and social concerns alongside traditional financial metrics has led to a paradigm shift in the banking industry. The incorporation of ESG principles into the regulatory framework seeks to align banking activities with sustainability goals, promoting long-term value creation and risk management. The European Union (EU) has been at the forefront of driving this transformation, emphasizing the integration of sustainability factors in the banking sector. The introduction of ESG principles into the European banking regulatory framework carries significant implications for banks. It requires a fundamental reassessment of their business models, risk management practices, and reporting frameworks. Banks need to adapt their strategies to account for the potential environmental and social impacts of their activities and develop responsible lending and investment practices. This shift enables banks to play a pivotal role in financing the transition to a more sustainable and inclusive economy. Moreover, the integration of ESG principles into the regulatory framework impacts regulatory authorities themselves. Regulators are responsible for designing and implementing policies that encourage sustainable practices while ensuring financial stability. This necessitates the development of robust frameworks that incorporate ESG considerations into prudential regulations, disclosure requirements, and stress testing methodologies. Regulators must strike a balance between promoting sustainability objectives and maintaining the resilience and stability of the banking sector. The incorporation of ESG principles into the European banking regulatory framework also has broader implications for stakeholders. It provides investors, shareholders, and consumers with greater transparency and information regarding banks' ESG performance. This empowers stakeholders to make informed decisions, directing their investments and support towards banks that demonstrate a commitment to sustainable practices. Additionally, the integration of ESG factors enhances the resilience of the banking sector to systemic risks stemming from climate change, social inequality, and governance failures. This research paper presented in this study aims at providing a comprehensive analysis of the introduction of ESG principles into the European banking regulatory framework. By examining the regulatory initiatives, policy frameworks, and industry practices, it will explore the opportunities and challenges associated with this integration. Furthermore, the paper will assess the impact of ESG incorporation on the risk management practices, business strategies, and reporting obligations of banks. By shedding light on these aspects, the research paper seeks to contribute to the ongoing debate on sustainable finance and responsible banking practices. The integration of ESG principles into the European banking regulatory framework represents a transformative step towards building a more sustainable and resilient financial system. It requires collaboration among banks, regulators, policymakers, and stakeholders to ensure effective implementation and alignment with global sustainability goals. Ultimately, by embedding ESG considerations into the regulatory framework, the European banking sector can play a crucial role in fostering a greener, more inclusive, and socially responsible economy. Climate risk stress tests on banks Climate change has emerged as one of the most pressing global challenges of our time, with far-reaching implications for the economy, society, and the environment. As the financial sector plays a crucial role in the allocation of capital and the management of risks, it is increasingly important to assess and manage the potential impacts of climate change on banks. In this context, climate risk stress tests have gained prominence as a tool to evaluate the resilience of banks to climate-related risks. The research paper on this study aims to explore the concept and significance of climate risk stress tests on banks, examining their methodology, challenges, and implications for the financial sector. Climate risk stress tests are designed to assess the potential financial impact of climate change on banks' balance sheets, profitability, and overall stability. They simulate a range of climate-related scenarios, including physical risks (such as extreme weather events and rising sea levels) and transition risks (such as policy changes and technological advancements in response to climate change). By subjecting banks' portfolios to these stress scenarios, regulators, policymakers, and banks themselves gain insights into their vulnerability to climate-related shocks and the adequacy of their risk management practices. The introduction of climate risk stress tests acknowledges the need to identify, measure, and manage climate-related risks within the banking sector. It helps banks understand their exposure to various climate risk drivers and informs decision-making processes regarding risk mitigation, capital planning, and strategic adaptation. Additionally, climate risk stress tests serve as a catalyst for enhancing transparency, accountability, and disclosure practices, as banks are required to communicate their climate risk exposure to stakeholders, including investors, regulators, and the public. However, implementing climate risk stress tests on banks presents various challenges. One significant challenge is the inherent uncertainty and complexity associated with climate change and its potential impacts. The long-term nature of climate-related risks, coupled with data limitations and modeling uncertainties, poses challenges in accurately assessing the financial consequences of climate change on banks' operations. Developing robust methodologies and models that adequately capture the multidimensional nature of climate risks is critical for the effectiveness of stress testing exercises. Moreover, climate risk stress tests require banks to incorporate climate-related considerations into their risk management frameworks and decision-making processes. This necessitates the development of new risk assessment tools, data infrastructure, and expertise within banks. Additionally, banks need to strengthen their understanding of climate-related risks in their lending and investment portfolios, enabling them to identify and manage exposures associated with carbon-intensive industries or geographies highly susceptible to climate-related risks. The implications of climate risk stress tests on banks extend beyond risk management practices. They also have broader systemic implications. By identifying vulnerabilities and promoting risk reduction, climate risk stress tests contribute to the overall resilience and stability of the financial system. Furthermore, these tests can stimulate banks to proactively integrate climate-related considerations into their strategies and operations, driving the transition towards a low-carbon and climate-resilient economy. This research paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of climate risk stress tests on banks. It will examine the methodologies employed in these stress tests by different authorities across the world, the challenges faced by banks and regulators, and the implications for risk management practices and financial stability. By evaluating existing practices and identifying areas for improvement, the research paper seeks to contribute to the ongoing development of effective frameworks for assessing and managing climate-related risks in the banking sector. Ultimately, integrating climate risk stress tests into the regulatory framework can enhance the resilience of banks, foster sustainable finance, and contribute to global efforts to mitigate and adapt to the challenges posed by climate change. Share buybacks Share buybacks have become a widely spread financial strategy employed by companies across various industries, including the banking sector, to return surplus surplus capital to shareholders. A share buyback, also known as a stock repurchase, occurs when a company repurchases its own outstanding shares from the market. The banking sector plays a pivotal role in the global economy, providing financial intermediation and supporting economic growth. Share buybacks in the banking industry have attracted significant attention due to their potential impact on financial stability, shareholder value, regulatory compliance, and market perception. Understanding the complexities involved in these operations is crucial for decision-making by banking institutions, regulators, and other stakeholders. One of the key risks associated with share buybacks in the banking sector is the potential impact on financial stability and capital adequacy. Banks are required to maintain adequate capital buffers to absorb potential losses and ensure resilience during economic downturns. Allocating a substantial portion of capital towards share buybacks may weaken a bank's capital position, making it more vulnerable to financial shocks. Furthermore, in times of heightened market volatility or systemic risks, reduced capital buffers can amplify the challenges faced by banks, potentially affecting their ability to fulfill their role as financial intermediaries. Another risk relates to the potential reduction in lending capacity. Banks play a critical role in providing credit to businesses and households, supporting investment and economic activity. However, when a bank utilizes capital for share buybacks rather than deploying it for loans and investments, it can limit its capacity to meet the credit needs of the economy. This limitation may have implications for overall economic growth and the bank's long-term profitability. Concentration of ownership and control is another risk associated with share buybacks. When a bank repurchases its shares, the ownership and control may become more concentrated in the hands of few shareholders. This concentration can raise concerns about governance and decision-making processes within the institution. It is essential to ensure that appropriate checks and balances are in place to mitigate the risks associated with such concentration of power and protect the interests of various stakeholders. While there are risks involved, share buybacks also present opportunities for banking institutions. One of the key opportunities is the potential enhancement of shareholders’ value. By reducing the number of outstanding shares, banks can increase earnings per share and potentially drive share prices higher. This can lead to increased returns for shareholders and improve market perception of the bank's financial health and growth prospects. Share buybacks also provide banks with the flexibility to optimize their capital structure and allocation. Institutions can utilize buybacks as a tool to rebalance their capital mix, adjusting the proportion of debt and equity to align with their risk appetite and strategic objectives. Additionally, when a bank generates excess capital, share buybacks can be an efficient means of returning capital to shareholders compared to other alternatives, such as dividend payments. Furthermore, share buybacks can serve as a market signaling mechanism. When a bank engages in share buybacks, it conveys management's confidence in the institution's future prospects and financial strength. This can bolster market confidence, attract additional investment, and positively impact the bank's overall valuation. The research paper presented in this study will contribute to the ongoing debate on share buybacks thereby guiding decision-making processes by banking institutions, regulators, and other stakeholders. Striking a balance between utilizing share buybacks as a value-enhancing strategy while managing potential risks is crucial for ensuring the long-term stability and sustainability of the banking sector.

Research products

11573/1688407 - 2023 - Does the banks’ performance improve after share buybacks?
Brogi, Marina; Lagasio, Valentina; Bruno, Michelangelo - 01a Articolo in rivista
paper: RISK MANAGEMENT MAGAZINE (Milano: Associazione italiana Financial Industry Risk Managers (AIFIRM)) pp. 4-12 - issn: 2612-3665 - wos: (0) - scopus: (0)

11573/1527849 - 2021 - Digitalisation, COVID-19 and the future of banking
Bruno, Michelangelo - 02a Capitolo o Articolo
book: London School of Economics, Business Review - ()

11573/1610220 - 2021 - Economia Sostenibile: rischi ed opportunita' per il sistema bancario italiano
Bruno, Michelangelo - 01a Articolo in rivista
paper: AIFIRM (AIFIRM) pp. 33-43 - issn: - wos: (0) - scopus: (0)

11573/1610218 - 2021 - An Overview of the European Policies on ESG in the Banking Sector
Bruno, Michelangelo; Lagasio, Valentina - 01a Articolo in rivista
paper: SUSTAINABILITY (Basel : MDPI) pp. - - issn: 2071-1050 - wos: WOS:000806896100001 (7) - scopus: 2-s2.0-85119183524 (12)

11573/1527847 - 2020 - Green finance: investors need transparency
Bruno, Michelangelo - 02a Capitolo o Articolo
book: Business Review, London School of Economics - ()

11573/1527851 - 2020 - Climate change: the impacts on financial intermediaries and their role in low-carbon transition
Bruno, Michelangelo - 02a Capitolo o Articolo
book: Oxford Business Law Blog - ()

11573/1527853 - 2018 - Is EU regulation of high frequency trading stringent enough?
Bruno, Michelangelo - 02a Capitolo o Articolo
book: London School of Economics, Business Review - ()

© Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" - Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma